Monday, August 29, 2005
Surfin in Mental Poop
For once in my life, school is relevant to what I care about. Pyschology actually matters to me and each subject is enthrawling and mind-rattling. For this I am truely greatful that I am persuing a high degree of education because now, I can hear a new view on the same old subjects i have been turning over in the oven that is my head.
Monotony is challenged daily more than any other conventional standard. What do you think the rage about divorce, affairs, marraige counsling, and the dismantalment of traditional values embodies? The youth, and the boomers, desire to break the chains of one man, one woman. Why? I have my own theories. All of which somehow filter in my personal values and beliefs, my dreams and hopes, my wild imagination, and my desire for freedom. By examining myself I can guess about others. But psychology offers the opposite approach. Examining others to learn about self.
Today, my professor stated "how lucky it is for the male that we practice monogomy as a society". At first, I totally disagreed. Everyone knows the bachelor squirms at the announcement of marriage, betrothal or anything confining. Must spread semon, says his loins, and the more the marrier says his mind. But further examination and discussion put a twist onto this train-reck of a statement. Every woman instinctually desires a man who will allow her prodigy to be successful and fullfilled. So, if left without social boundaries and moral binds, each successful man would have 3,5,10 women to his name. This seems all fine and dandy, especially to those modern day men who tend to marry all the fertile women in the world like J. Leno and the like, but then we have to adjust our view. What about those not so successful men? They would be left empty and eggless, no woman to impregnate and thus they would live a lonely existence. In my conclusion, about 5% of the male population would be getting the action and all those"boundless" penis loving boys who suggest the disarmment of monotony would likely be the ones left out of the gene pool.
But then again, that is just one opinion.
On a more moral level there is so much more to consider, and even more on the purely pleasurable level. But who really wants to delve into that. I think I've made enough people angry for one night
peace out from LA (that was gross, I know) ¶ 10:47 PM
Monotony is challenged daily more than any other conventional standard. What do you think the rage about divorce, affairs, marraige counsling, and the dismantalment of traditional values embodies? The youth, and the boomers, desire to break the chains of one man, one woman. Why? I have my own theories. All of which somehow filter in my personal values and beliefs, my dreams and hopes, my wild imagination, and my desire for freedom. By examining myself I can guess about others. But psychology offers the opposite approach. Examining others to learn about self.
Today, my professor stated "how lucky it is for the male that we practice monogomy as a society". At first, I totally disagreed. Everyone knows the bachelor squirms at the announcement of marriage, betrothal or anything confining. Must spread semon, says his loins, and the more the marrier says his mind. But further examination and discussion put a twist onto this train-reck of a statement. Every woman instinctually desires a man who will allow her prodigy to be successful and fullfilled. So, if left without social boundaries and moral binds, each successful man would have 3,5,10 women to his name. This seems all fine and dandy, especially to those modern day men who tend to marry all the fertile women in the world like J. Leno and the like, but then we have to adjust our view. What about those not so successful men? They would be left empty and eggless, no woman to impregnate and thus they would live a lonely existence. In my conclusion, about 5% of the male population would be getting the action and all those"boundless" penis loving boys who suggest the disarmment of monotony would likely be the ones left out of the gene pool.
But then again, that is just one opinion.
On a more moral level there is so much more to consider, and even more on the purely pleasurable level. But who really wants to delve into that. I think I've made enough people angry for one night
peace out from LA (that was gross, I know) ¶ 10:47 PM
Comments:
<< Home
hey pretty. isn't it wonderful what college does to the mind? i'm glad you're learning and thinking and posting it on your blog.
I could hear your voice in this one. I was not angry, but rather, wishing I had somewhere to spread my semon :)
See, after reading this post about all the undesireable men not getting to spread their seed I immediately wondered what would happen with all the andesirable women. Desirable men usually have higher standards. It only makes sense that they would still have to make due with their undesirable counterparts to procreate. And doesn't that even things out a little bit?
I am going to assume that men are somewhat choosy, but when it comes not sex, not necesarilly picky. Thus, more undesirable women would be given a chance than undesirable men. Its like they say, a woman can always find a man who wants sex, but men can't always find a woman.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home
